[su_row]
[su_column size="1/2" center="yes" class=""]
xxxx

<h4>Some language stuff</h4>
谁 - not "who". It's "whoever". 
XXXX
[/su_column]
[/su_row]

<div class="readingPassage">
[su_row]
[su_column size="1/2" center="no" class=""]
<div id="chinesetext">
<h4>画蛇添足</h4>

有个人举办晚会，把一壶酒给客人喝。客人拿着这壶酒，觉得这么多人喝一壶酒，肯定不够，还不如给一个人喝。可是到底给谁好呢？于是，客人商量了一个好主意，就是每个人在地上画一条蛇，<span class="highlightText">谁</span>先画完了这壶酒就给<span class="highlightText">谁</span>喝。大家都同意这个办法。

每个客人拿了一根小棍，开始在地上画蛇。有一个人画得很快，他几分钟就把蛇画好了，于是他把酒壶拿了过来。正待他要喝酒时，他看见其他人还没把蛇画完，他十分得意地又拿起小棍，自言自语地说：“看我再来给蛇添上几只脚，他们也未必画完。” 边说边给画好的蛇画脚。

不料，这个人给蛇画脚还没完，手上的酒壶便被旁边一个人一把抢了过去，原来，那个人的蛇画完了。

这个给蛇画脚的人不依，说：“我最先画完蛇，酒应该给我喝！”

那个人笑着说：“你到现在还在画，而我已经画完，酒当然是我的！”

画蛇脚的人说：“我早就画完了，现在是趁时间还早，不过是给蛇添几只脚而已。”

那人说：“蛇本来就没有脚，你要给它添几只脚那你就添吧，酒反正你是喝不成了！”

那人很不客气地喝起酒来，那个给蛇画脚的人却看着本属自己而现在已被别人拿走的酒，很后悔。
</div>
[/su_column]
[su_column size="1/2" center="no" class=""]
[hide-this-part morelink="Show English translation"]
A long long time ago, four blind people wanted to know what an elephant looks like. But they couldn't see it, and could only touch it with their hands. 

The first blind person touched the elephant's teeth. He said: “I know! An elephant looks like a big radish.” 

The second blind person touched the elephant's ears. He yelled out: “No no, the elephant looks like a big fan!” 

“You're both wrong, the elephant is just a large pillar.” Turns out the  third blind person was touching the elephant's leg. 

The fourth blind person disagreed, and said: “The elephant isn't that big at all, it's just a rope.” He was touching the elephant's tail. 

The four blind people argued endlessly, and they all said that the part they touched was the elephant's true appearance. And in reality? None of them were correct.

“Blind people touch an elephant” teaches us that we shouldn't just look at one part of a problem. We should look at all of it, and only then can we truly understand the problem. 
[/hide-this-part]
[/su_column]
[/su_row]</div>